tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4767367404083449877.post7983716976809509827..comments2023-06-18T19:22:30.589+05:45Comments on brazesh: Clarifying the confusionbrazeshhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06984837761321410266noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4767367404083449877.post-39461738341330823682008-09-13T23:26:46.000+05:452008-09-13T23:26:46.000+05:45Khoi dai, kuro bujhnai garo chha ho!Yo (c) ko chak...Khoi dai, kuro bujhnai garo chha ho!<br>Yo (c) ko chakkar...<br><br>When I said above lines, I meant that taking picture of other's creation never makes you the holder of (c) for that item.<br>My query was whether you can take picture and make it under your right...<br><br>You can have the (c) of your blog, but not the picture. Because the blog is your creation, but the picture is depicting the creation of someone. (This is the huge problem in our world.) If you take picture of Natural things, then may be, you are privileged to have (c). But again, taking picture of masks which are created by some others and having (c)... ?<br><br>I am learning."navin"http://ajabgajab.blogspot.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4767367404083449877.post-626701814493897322008-09-26T19:45:33.000+05:452008-09-26T19:45:33.000+05:45Dear Nabin..i am trying to help you out with your ...Dear Nabin..i am trying to help you out with your confusion. Well for example yarchagumba is an natural asset and suppose you took picture of it. So the picture, you owe it. And in case if someone wants to publish it anywhere then your permisiion is needed. For the same purpose people have begun to write copyright and we should respect them.And i guess there is nothing to understand more about it. :dAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com